College Law Student

This video clip is of a lawyer questioning a man on whether he can tell the difference in hand signals that might have been used in traffic as related to his case.

You can tell that the lawyer is having a little fun with the questioning much to the dismay of the other side.

Was the lawyer out of order by doing so?

Does this seem very professional even though the vulgar hand signal might actually be relevant to the case?

How should the lawyer have handled it?

I’m still trying to figure out what this is warning against.

Do they want to keep you from urinating?

Maybe they want you to urinate but only in short bursts?

Even worse, this could be a threat as to what could happen to violators of the urinating rule.